Compare / Continue vs Cursor
Continue vs Cursor
An open IDE extension compared with a closed IDE agent.
This page compares the structured fields and assessments for two listings.
It does not assign a score. Fields were last checked on each listing’s
verifiedAt date.
| Continue Verified | Cursor Verified | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Open-source IDE agent for VS Code and JetBrains. | Agent-focused IDE with cloud agents running in isolated VMs. |
| Layers | Execution | Orchestration, Execution, Sandboxing, Verification |
| Model independence | Multi-model | Multi-model |
| Deployment | Self-hosted | Cloud |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 (see repo) | Proprietary |
| Pricing model | Mixed | Mixed |
Continue
Assessment
Continue remains a local IDE harness while the Cursor acquisition creates roadmap risk. It documents bring-your-own models and a public repository at verification. Factory orchestration sits outside the extension; Cursor's closed cloud runtime is separate.
Cursor
Assessment
Cursor is an agent IDE with Cloud Agents, snapshots, hooks, and team sharing. Those surfaces cover execution and workspace isolation; orchestration and verification still depend on the agent run and its tests. The product is closed, cloud-hosted, and billed through seats and model usage. BYOK applies in the IDE; Cloud Agents and Automations route usage through Cursor. Treat Auto as convenience routing, not operator-controlled model independence.